CLAT PG revised results 2025 declared following Delhi HC order

The Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) has declared the revised results for the Common Law Admission Test - postgraduate (CLAT PG 2025), as per the directions of the Delhi High Court. Candidates will be able to check their CLAT PG revised scores on the official website, consortiumofnlus.ac.in/clat-2025/.

The Consortium will now announce the CLAT PG counselling 2025 dates for LLM admissions. Qualified candidates will have to register and fill choices on the portal to participate in the counselling process.

The CLAT PG counselling got delayed by over 5 months due to the discrepancies in the answer key and the results. The petitioners approached the Delhi High Court intially, however, the case was transferred to the Supreme Court. Later, the top court ordered the Delhi HC to hear the plea pertaining to the PG law entrance test.

Delhi HC decision on CLAT PG 2025

The petitioners had also raised concerns about the excessive objection fee of Rs 1,000 to challenge one question. Upon consideration, the court advised the Consortium to place this issue before the committee headed by Justice G Raghuram (Retd.) and adhere to his suggestion.

Question number 56 - Owing to a discrepancy between the four options in the master booklet, the question has been withdrawn.

Question number 21 - This question was concerning the most important factor to determine whether an activity constitutes “an industry”. The Consortium contended that option ‘B’ is the correct answer which indicates that it is a ‘dominant function’ of an establishment.

Whereas, learned counsel for the petitioners forcefully contended that option ‘C’, i.e., which indicates the nature of activity and the authority of the employer over its employees is the determinative factor as to whether an establishment would fall within the definition of ‘an industry”.

However, the court observed that the passage is not an actual extract from the judgment in Bangalore Water Supply (supra) but appears to be from a Commentary or from a Digest. Therefore, it ruled that the option C is the correct answer.

Question number 57 - The Consortium admitted that passage XII is not an extract from the aforesaid judgment. However, the court agreed with the Consortium and said that option (a) is the correct answer.

Question number 98 - The court stated that option B – Salmond is the right response, and not option A - Pound.