Vagisha Kaushik | October 8, 2025 | 03:47 PM IST | 1 min read
TNPSC Group 2 Result 2025: Candidates can view and challenge provisional answer keys on tnpsc.gov.in.
Get education, career guidance; live webinars; learning resources and more
Subscribe Now
The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) has issued the provisional answer key of Combined Civil Services Examination 2 in Group 2 and 2A services. Candidates who appeared for the recruitment examination can download the TNPSC group 2 answer key 2025 through the official website at tnpsc.gov.in.
The TNPSC group 2 answer key PDFs are available for general English with general studies aptitude and mental ability, and general Tamil with general studies aptitude and mental ability. Candidates are allowed to raise objections against the provisional answer key by October 14, till 5:45 pm.
The commission informed that candidates can challenge all the questions except question number 93 in General English paper and question number 101 in General Studies paper. In respect of question number 93 in the General English paper and question number 101 in the General Studies paper, the commission has already decided to place them before the expert committee.
However, candidates can submit their grievances against the latter two questions with proper evidence, it added.
Moreover, question numbers 62-64 in general English paper and question numbers 37-41 in general Tamil paper, have to be answered based on the paragraph given above question number 62 and 37 respectively.
TNPSC Group 2 Prelims 2025 was held on September 28 in a single shift. 5.53 lakh candidates applied for the test. The recruitment drive aims to fill 645 vacancies.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
The plea challenges the SSC’s September 8 notification, which warned individuals and social media platforms against analysing or sharing question papers of conducted exams. The petitioner claims that the rule exceeds the scope of the examination law.
Vikas Kumar Pandit